215<P Style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> <STRONG> "News 1 +1" February 29, 2012, Taiwan </STRONG> </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">,
Chanel HANDBags < STRONG> - iPad: name dispute </STRONG> </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> (guides) </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> explanation: </P> <P style = "TEXT-the INDENT: 2em"> is a famous Apple, a verge of bankruptcy Proview Shenzhen, the iPad trademark dispute, the Guangdong High Court upheld the results of a tremendous impact. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Ji Chenghai Taiwan Reporter: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> the original defendant, their views were heated debate . </P> <P Zeng Bo style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, Dacheng Law Firm: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, Proview that is obtained through legitimate channels. trademarks of authorization. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Commentary: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, more than two years of intense game, a huge market plays a vital role in Apple territory. iPad trademark of the Guangdong High Court will make a judgment of what? </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Yang Rong Mountain Proview Group founder: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> We just under Chinese law to maintain our interests. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Commentary: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> After the verdicts, Shijiazhuang, Shenyang, Hangzhou, Guiyang, Apple iPad product have suffered the investigation and the shelf, while some places Apple iPad products sold in the normal. Not the same as behind the attitude of the Chinese trademark registration and protection in the end what kind of status quo? </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> "News 1 +1" Todays Focus: "iPad trademark is not just the interests!" </P Dong Qian,> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Moderator: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, good evening, and welcome to being broadcast "News 1 +1 "first look behind me this picture. This is a small ant bite is a Big Apple, the Big Apple, of course, refers to the global market, rich as Apple, but the little ants Shenzhen Proview, which is a little-known small companies even reported that this company has been on the verge of the verge of bankruptcy. What is bigger than the two companies are indisputable? iPad trademark rights. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> morning Shenzhen Proview Apple iPad trademark use rights disputes in the case of second instance in the Guangdong High Court began hearing the results of
Louis vuitton handbags this trial for both sides to crucial, as it relates to the iPad trademark rights in mainland China in the end is who should. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Ji Chenghai Taiwan Reporter: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> to here is
Nike Dunk High the Guangdong Province Higher Peoples Court of social concern Apple and Shenzhen Proview mainland China iPad trademark ownership dispute case, upheld the trial here nine oclock. We
air jordan shoes see that the courthouse has gathered a lot of media reporters and sit in the masses, According to the person in charge of the rapidly department of the Guangdong High Court, from the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong, Japan, the United States and more than 50 media interview requests prior to them . </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Commentary: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> TV, radio, newspapers, websites, and today almost all the media focus In the Proview and the Apple iPad trademark ants as the dispute. The court the scene more than 50 domestic and foreign media, to apply for an interview is only a microcosm behind all public curious about the same issue in the case of apples of First Instance against the decision to the iPad in China, the ultimate fate of the second instance, what it is. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> February 29, 2012 News: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Proview Technology Shenzhen Co., Ltd. and the U.S. Apple iPad trademark ownership dispute, the second-instance trial of this case has ended, and the judge did not pronounce. Commentary: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> </P>, <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">
air jordan shoes exactly who owns the trademark iPad
Chanel Outlet in mainland China, the results also need to wait. The trial today, Apple has not only provided new evidence, it has added an appellant and a new law firm. Only one purpose, request the Guangdong High Court revoked the first instance verdict, sent back to reaffirm or commuted. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Apple in court shows Shenzhen Proview intermediary with the Apple UK IP to communicate with e-mail, Apple advocate, the two sides had a lot of e-mails iPad trading range of
Louis vuitton handbags the transfer of trademark rights, the price reached a consensus, the invitation commitment already exists, and constitute a trademark transfer contract, but Shenzhen Proview said that all e-mail only that the two sides in the negotiation process, according to Article 10 of the "Contract Law" Proview and shall be subject to the final IP company and the Taiwan signed a written contract-based, no matter the final outcome, this iPad trademark dispute has led to the vibration of the legal profession and industry. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> February 25, 2012 News: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, regardless of Shenzhen Proview and the results of Apples trademark rights how this incident is likely to become a milestone event in the domestic intellectual property litigation, the dispute will give many companies in a lively intellectual property courses, on the one hand, trademark associated with great benefits, companies need to take the initiative to maintain trademarks, product knowledge property rights; Shenzhen Proview and apple volume, but in the face of intellectual property rules, whether it is a small company or the world market capitalization of the enterprise are not the law is eligible for Free rights. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Commentary: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> compared to far-reaching impact on the legal level, the iPad trademark dispute brings Apple the wound has occurred. In December last year, Apple lost in the first instance with the the Proview trademark dispute, Shijiazhuang, Xuzhou, Nanjing, Guangzhou and other places iPad have shelves. In addition to the physical seller, Amazon, the internet store, Jingdong Mall Apple iPad product line has been off the shelf. Allegedly, these e-commerce website received a notice of the Apple iPad next frame. The industry believes that the worst outcome for Apple than for a trademark to continue selling the current channels, agents, dealers wait for the verdict, most of them choose not to purchase a large number. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Liyan Yong Yue (China) Electric Marketing Manager: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> When a verdict is Proview wins, then or to take measures on the next frame, so insurance and safety point. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Commentary: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, at a time when Apple released news of iPad3 be available next month. Market, ranging from huge commercial interests of people anxious. In the face of this enormous impact on the trademark dispute, the High Court of Guangdong what will make what kind of judgment? </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Moderator: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> on todays hearing, we have to connect the reporter Hebei into the sea. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Ji Chenghai, hello. Today we learned through a variety of media, go reported this matter to other countries and regional media, you observe the trial is very intense? </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Ji Chenghai: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">, yes. The first is a very high degree of media attention to this matter, some of the situations that I see from the court inside the scene, the publicity department of the Guangdong High Court to give us, from the Mainland, Hong Kong, the United States, Japan, more than 50 domestic and foreign media attended the observers, and is very fortunate to be able to enter the journalists and the media to attend court because of their prior application, outside the court, my initial observation about sixty-seven ten journalists, because they did not submit an application in advance, can not enter to the court which . However, the Guangdong High Court the principle of open and transparent, they also passed the official microblogging is the timely dissemination of trial information to the media to do reports. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT:
air jordan shoes 2em"> Moderator: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> you just said is the concern of the media on this matter, let me talk some of the things in the course of the trial. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> Ji Chenghai: </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em"> trial, which involve huge economic interests behind the iPad trademark. So whether it is Apple or Shenzhen Proview law firm hired by both sides are the top. The defendant in court Uehara both the agent, I have seen, the two sides agent is raging, and tit for tat, so that the judge in the morning and afternoon to some links, for example, the court or the court debate survey link to the end of time, have an agent will need to continue argue that the judges say this is the case, when in the morning to say a word, is now quarter past twelve, adjourned the afternoon to show you the eloquent . Afternoon when the judge a little anxious to provoke, even to say you are presiding over the court or presiding over this case. </P> <P style="TEXT-INDENT: 2em">
